From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:13:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7zvvye9.fsf@web.de> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2t7wc9d.fsf@web.de> <83d14rqjv8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510269238 7436 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 23:13:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:13:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 10 00:13:54 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCw1B-0001hA-RP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:13:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCw1J-0007li-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:14:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCw17-0007lY-6U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCw12-0007Df-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:61170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCw11-0007Bq-V2; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.120.125]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIvFp-1eFPvF2btp-002TuZ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:13:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83d14rqjv8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:26:19 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jW1DavDBGTYZh83M7tC0o6ceo8hzkOtDoHr2v2Fdl7Q+GdkMwZE GTVaP20tQJNVjItyoxERHnmDgKgR8QpBFgKQgbPt12bjg8+eR+tKfrsj9Q1pLONse9TDLZ6 OIwRCkIVVBRr6ZRVwrQ3nLv6nTvCUnV6FDvKk9RBdJ3a/AkwAv5ajCPSXHeWodv42YxingE YVN3yb0ybBeHBTR8pHzqg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:sNeudXLHZtc=:i6lEAtDYr2X3SGt+5sUib6 jR0iFUaa8CS8lMiC2/wZoEKMtUfQoRAFdO9bMed2tV2iLGJsxedDwbUpfOvxCpMvlROkeupm3 Fo7BFbVz3lsLF3uMergJra02BmVXj/n8Iv7KlynBp+ut98GKZZCMcoz+tb9ET1jx2qvdeL9xv /r7NUfeaVYljTp6TNFfwKfa5h7/UaWSEYY3LqxQT6T5kfSZwv7xtt+UeZKIPHXzdRxCowU+A9 KRJOWB2+oILL7w6kCbIb/nDEKCG+6bRCsyhLdYPhaTd1/HTsy4MSXxnWtZOggOjCOa4cSDATo AamWq9xcHEWW+oLM9OupjwF/qqdV2lyMO4UhFJFkuNBlVoskdjnU+Fi9uI1RV6id5HSN/DHzt kFd8p+DlOHWau3twAEtIZtmpW1fUm29AopX+Fb6ax+DuIH3SRPCj4PgHmwMBLLtjtiML0wRfF sTcvetcDg3eB1c+rk0m6jTZ/PiZpkQDDP8mbcXX7DqJPZaKDsJEV903gQ8D+yvdbTW+e1yk7t Jbl8o8zUa+yf+WfLHcIr2w89n5zxeNt6M+Nei4bLbpuBCkZTzLp7rXP3rmjwMj0oxYVL+NwD/ 1WcN0nEgJptKqISpB5lnjYuJsZWwpKIunD49Q0x3nk8/baCh1Mcv54aArhYMSRd+uQWS5RveM hdRC8kRD1zbSLWMIjp2C94at+zsMiD2t9WVyZM7edWfiB59hStrMoezL5xzCGky1RGjNPP45J q+qIl5DNZ+lgNvryJjDvcq3cq7vOD1o4e/7dfjK0xDpqVPh84V9A4qXuvnQhnjulrKXcUojb X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220013 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I'm not sure I fully get what "internal" means in this context... > > It means not intended for use outside of Emacs internals. But no doubt `when', for example, is used outside of Emacs internals...? Anyway, I'm also ok to move the lazy lets to "thunk.el": it's also a natural place for it, and we all seem to be happier with this solution. Question: When I do that, is it allowed to keep `lazy-let' as an alias to `thunk-let' (despite the library prefix rule)? And I guess we would still want the addition to the manual? Thanks, Michael.