From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 10:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7swyrlc.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20180518185010.GA30011@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526718579 24260 195.159.176.226 (19 May 2018 08:29:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 08:29:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, George Plymale II , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Alan Third Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 19 10:29:35 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fJxF9-0006DD-8k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 10:29:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJxHG-0006iz-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 04:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJxH7-0006ij-Jg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 04:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJxH4-0008O4-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 04:31:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:36929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJxH4-0008MI-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 04:31:34 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.91.249.45]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDE6y-1f3S4k0MG4-00GW5E; Sat, 19 May 2018 10:31:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180518185010.GA30011@breton.holly.idiocy.org> (Alan Third's message of "Fri, 18 May 2018 19:50:10 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PEva9f5nxY/+httg+7eGUoipmId7mEzrtTVrhJeg+UwiMIjdt2p KFazNzIV8agmZuTr+dWfnw9idaWYMWH2KHNa0DiXrBnaqMcAsqLt4vaSZKXjMJG15pYBvQs s5Tie1I5vzmeurcIXTPA7QcfV9Ae56FU5+IxjPJliJKvk1SOb7juwlug/oruv4vI3p9Ip/E acR0s2HGeun3SmnUrgosw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:5c4aQ6CLl9s=:vOOrGxzj5bbbO5RpvKQWC4 bWAvHViVPdxfjLErdsg822dK8IQyNlQVJunvHZxuwDCyl13mvZnyYuSjoUCOHXCQZThBFdrm6 5HuwQr2kERxbWHg55A6lGwQFeMS1IsHwQ1mLNUFkYZWl9GUNZF+NfumV6Tn4M7I41ImaoM8CB /QkSFVx9A+Ku5jMrCVwNT0f44Ffji+jNx/5X4SqMmzApkOhZNruGUZXPLt44KA+axSAChXXK+ lK/k2+68ceeIOX3HaKxSF5vvWrSfXyCTdECkZyMQT/RN9LgkblhBmsIpMIVcY05ljPbJYbVua AAPXSwJgL/z7k8aZ89hGKI18EfVvaaXQDLrNso1wQ+X8mNHSS6bgsgpkby4VqYduvlU2IwaPV CcOygKjEaEoZjSzSr8UDBgFBdiIGmGFpHmT5hwyeiSpLmtlGnvr0/seQwQHhE+/KzHd9lcoJL pYin/30LzkZo0I2y3f5v4LPPdAvhARdbeWFBN97eUH2IeHSvgdLdbIPlOPV77sUzTtrPux5nq R0ONMIeKWUMAVpv1Tu2oJXAJRuDyvB4SOING7UBTZm06BqqmRqk3yY58A0C4ltLr6EITMDkVz 0jiRp+q6KB7dM64iEQEpQUEDvHBpTy/moCYcEnnedwqFzXsruA339PD/c4s5WpfFFf2jr4W63 kmgI1YOEqEpF1ccMTkTeTuDDVRqw7fRSi1K+7ISFLIAtFmQa7ClsUBhyFG1Y6woeCAgfX8wAe mjMRjyau4ZdHmG4OOvcK1MdqKXRADPbDqpcL4n6mc/r90v40IbYaqi9L+ihYhd436JWXVkXN X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225426 Archived-At: Alan Third writes: Hi Alan, >> Is there anyone else in particular that I should Cc for further >> discussion on this topic? I'm not sure who's presently in charge of the >> NS port. No rush or anything... I just would prefer for this not to go >> stale. > > No, nobody else. I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s officially anyone = in charge of > the NS port, but in practice it=E2=80=99s probably me. Maybe you add yourself to admin/MAINTAINERS? Best regards, Michael.