From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: :alnum: broken? Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:51:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87a74yg0p1.fsf@ebih.ebihd> References: <86wo8flqct.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <1c654ac9-10a2-4e5d-f77c-3b78bb580ffc@cs.ucla.edu> <83v9nqg8la.fsf@gnu.org> <298a093f-6eed-3a9f-99cf-bd17b9cb61f0@cs.ucla.edu> <83blpifp95.fsf@gnu.org> <81bfdae0-9fe1-f173-adb1-b5fe2ba2b808@cs.ucla.edu> <834kvafnwk.fsf@gnu.org> <8DA6D8F4-921B-4FB8-A7A3-CE75B10CE668@acm.org> <83zhd2e6h6.fsf@gnu.org> <87k14547u7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ftet3xo4.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ftetqbi9.fsf@mbork.pl> <64bcf65a-d05f-b49e-b640-cb64a5b19c77@gmail.com> <878skjr8yo.fsf@mbork.pl> <877e03qlaw.fsf@mbork.pl> <87y2sjfbke.fsf@ebih.ebihd> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="27513"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:BDVlHmJK8Ex0O3jgAkRUGYAHxVQ= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 02 17:51:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oIH-00073U-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:51:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oIG-0001UI-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oHk-00014g-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oHj-000088-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:38280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oHj-00007w-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j8oHf-0006DJ-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:51:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 159.69.161.202 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245169 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >>> [...] I want my files to be 100% >>> warning-free. >> >> Yeah, optimally one would! > > No, not necessarily. Not if a file is > intended to support multiple releases and > that means having conditional code that can > use "obsolete" constructs in some branches, > for the benefit of an older release. That's right, because then, you WANT warnings! Ööö -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal