From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:55:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6tnn1x3.fsf@igel.home> References: <5feaf98365b55_3f903d428113941@emba.gnu.org.mail> <87o8ica9xp.fsf@gmx.de> <87pn2s35a2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft3oa4pz.fsf@gmx.de> <8735zo9ui7.fsf@gmx.de> <87h7nw39gg.fsf@gmail.com> <874kjv3ejm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 10:58:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwj6o-0005Eh-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:58:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36704 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwj6n-0007Xa-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwj5L-00072p-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]:39689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwj3n-00046G-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D97CY4gXzz1rx85 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:55:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D97CY4Y4Lz1rPhZ for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:55:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0BuO0rKFCW4 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:55:21 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: rlLY16V1iFK03yuAH/DTbm9nwCVTiIFOpbKmC8efoKfuJI7BwkhVFM0hLPfVlPY+ Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-182-153.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.182.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:55:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 727352C3591; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:55:20 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: When this load is DONE I think I'll wash it AGAIN.. In-Reply-To: <874kjv3ejm.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:42:53 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262510 Archived-At: On Jan 05 2021, Robert Pluim wrote: > The code is this: > > (while (not (or sentinel-called > (> (- (float-time) start-time) > process-test-sentinel-wait-timeout))) > (accept-process-output)) > > You mean between checking 'sentinel-called' and > 'accept-process-output', the sentinel is called, the process exit's and > then 'accept-process-output' hangs? I guess thatʼs possible. No, that is not possible, as the process sentinel is only called while inside accept-process-output. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."