From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Fix" sag scaling for hidpi Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:01:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6saya8u.fsf@gmail.com> References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2786"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Yuan Fu , Eli Zaretskii , Alan Third , emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 15:17:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lACmk-0000cy-V9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:17:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49164 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACmj-0000OM-UJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACWx-0007xf-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:39463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACWs-0000pX-6t; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id u14so5847848wmq.4; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:01:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d9mIIx9lsl5Z8duHL2jVHLbgSesH9Db/yc4NWrmG/7Q=; b=Pehx3ri0hlnMn+7tygm9KS7ZeSulzNwHWUSaQCUakjKEKTVrGxOuLLv+aO1qJKn7WX wANKBQRXnyM17TgFHm6dmUd05A/PwLIYaKYTcH47BKlp5kcxVUMIoOTnrAId3Q6oNx3i Rxwl+6eFTVco6yXA76+ujLdUQ6rfLfFviphi4L5GREMualC8Tr3xgBkkXli0kfRjb2sy b2xNLn7eg1OrK2FmRnENHWJqlI097LnJSfdLz8rMMG4Oa3fFWtwXrw95ILRIPM2mXTAB oMOj0+C3whEqFEt+2N54vzjphmjRsw9iLZFICDpCFYkszOLdSiPL/j3BuPE8UuQX1iDr RbvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d9mIIx9lsl5Z8duHL2jVHLbgSesH9Db/yc4NWrmG/7Q=; b=K47es0i0UqGYTgZgyqR3UCYM4gK4vuNioVv7DaNjZVUzggOx0rhVVEJfNM4qvMleXB Ux6hcr9h6JrgsUfaa+ZkzEbkpv68dBxeQIqCCotd0uKA3Y1+qSQiQ3TXizRwm13iWyCa TdiCeucN8V0tBL2yGjk1vT8jltDFigFf5fclYO5AORXX6PhNWTBJN6ZwFGJFGJAX6w6U Jyt9ACNxhC1Sdlswcxv0QMcfusi8/FlTqYlrBbAweEQnNFZibY6fpU0V+kR5aTqP+9tC un8c2d0Umb1d48SxeARDxkmTOzxUWMCe0gnHoq0HsBwOQ4GSE5xvauvqfAYK/RyksS+m jgYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aSi2TSGJv5ImWSU5m+QtWEYpijOnYqo3zmzeLEzoqnoYXlDMQ 8R6hoR35rcdf5jwj+F7lggI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXnIIjMHO/WVvOYJexkxvyGo5gX+FzzSU/Q066lTk881OSWD+y972CIoP+m9W0meT/HBfg/w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d8a:: with SMTP id t132mr5148228wmt.119.1613052066889; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:01:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a861:69b6:6aaf:dbd3:8964]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm9071562wmh.9.2021.02.11.06.01.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:01:06 -0800 (PST) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:00 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32b; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264378 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:00 -0500, Stefan Monnier said: >> Eli, Lars, when can we realistically envisage deprecating lucid >> support? Followed a release later by the current gtk support. Stefan> I suspect that the "current gtk" support will disappear before = the Lucid Stefan> support, since the Lucid support is still AFAIK the only one th= at Stefan> supports having frames on multiple X servers. ? both pure and impure gtk let you do that. Are you talking about the 'crash when the display goes away' problem? That=CA=BCs an annoyance, but it doesn=CA=BCt stop you using multiple frames. Stefan> I also suspect that the "current gtk" support can disappear as = soon as Stefan> the "pgtk" port is marked non-experimental, hence soon, e.g. it= could be Stefan> gone for Emacs-29. I=CA=BCm sharpening my delete key :-) Robert