From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Interpret #r"..." as a raw string Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 12:18:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6rl249j.fsf@igel.home> References: <20210227.031857.1351840144740816188.conao3@gmail.com> <87blc1khes.fsf@db48x.net> <87o8g1278p.fsf@igel.home> <877dmpkeos.fsf@db48x.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13276"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: Matt Armstrong , Alan Mackenzie , Naoya Yamashita , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Brooks Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 12:19:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lH33R-0003JO-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 12:19:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH33Q-00044B-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 06:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH32X-00034N-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 06:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:46383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH32U-0008B9-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 06:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DqZP62r7xz1qt3j; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:18:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DqZP62QHKz1sP6g; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:18:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geHvgMMZ1LZF; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:18:01 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: jwNMZwc1t8NFkFiOfz44kdzyS7Myz6VcnZ+B0YDzob0F9Mdl9mad3C+T9YRDkC71 Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-185-132.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.185.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:18:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17C672C3770; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:18:01 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: .. I think I'd better go back to my DESK and toy with a few common MISAPPREHENSIONS... In-Reply-To: <877dmpkeos.fsf@db48x.net> (Daniel Brooks's message of "Tue, 02 Mar 2021 02:55:31 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.9; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265817 Archived-At: On Mär 02 2021, Daniel Brooks wrote: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> There is also the tcl way, where {} delimits kind of raw strings, but >> allows properly nested {} pairs inside. > > That's an unusual choice; I'll have to keep it in mind for the next time > this topic comes up. Apparently you can escape the curly braces if you > don't want them to be paired up inside this type of string. The backslash is not removed, though, so it is impossible to include a lone brace in a brace enclosed string. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."