From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:06:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6hnxaql.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <87o869wkcx.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl298n9b.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmqpv1jm.fsf@gnus.org> <834k818jwm.fsf@gnu.org> <874k80fkpm.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl285o6b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o868cor3.fsf@gnus.org> <835ysg5no7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0gwcoce.fsf@gnus.org> <8335nk5lag.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1b39kza.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsrj2hyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87y259r8fa.fsf@gnus.org> <83v90dy7mb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k7v2i7p.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnkrukz0.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee6z12pn.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1azukd4.fsf@gnu.org> <83o863ujvb.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf17uj0c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 16:07:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mriFi-0005kX-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:07:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mriFg-0007v1-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mriEV-0006bo-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=48490 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mriET-0007iB-NR; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:06:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JYd3BF+Q6F7Akpp2tvhXO7yDB/VOB3kpnNW/JM9MU5g=; b=gdV8crZpUaPlt/fip4AD0MV7bq dmALPShiSwjzETKUnvttZFK8hyNL1lNfHGBc5eH3njfSZQuSwExn8n3/G+kMaOaFZ86rQCytTV+TQ baw7V72RainCaPPUdRSYdD30WSLE7yXyobQ4FPepVrtRe267X6niuhqXGHlKvbLeuG8A=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mriEO-0005OZ-6m; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:06:14 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Black Midi's _Cavalcade_: "Diamond Stuff" In-Reply-To: <83lf17uj0c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:35:47 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280493 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> There's one other alternative: extend display_string to accept >> FIELD_WIDTH in pixel units (or add another argument to that effect). >> This could be set by examining the 'display' property before calling >> display_string. The disadvantage is that only the min-width spec >> could be supported this way for mode-line constructs that are produced >> from C strings. > > Are you okay with this idea? If so, I can work on it. Yes, great! -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no