From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_spawn blocks SIGCHLD in spawned processes Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6chasiw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <7CFD5E28-8266-4004-BF66-255146D72722@gnu.org> <83r18whunp.fsf@gnu.org> <36bbd45c-0a87-13b7-1589-afe943329e20@fastmail.com> <83ee4whqpf.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8y33hu1.fsf@rfc20.org> <83sft7aqxd.fsf@gnu.org> <3db6c69c-0c08-3f92-491b-0b715b18eb40@fastmail.com> <87pmo6c3h6.fsf@gmail.com> <86o82mvybj.fsf@hoetzel.info> <87zgm6ghdz.fsf@gmail.com> <864k4dvhr6.fsf@hoetzel.info> <87ee1tb0oc.fsf@gmail.com> <83a6chuke0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36647"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, juergen@hoetzel.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sauliusmenkevicius@fastmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, matt@rfc20.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 19 19:33:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngrjD-0009Nj-Sf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:33:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngrjC-0003no-La for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngri0-0002GI-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:41877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngrhz-0008W2-Bq; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id e21so23406845wrc.8; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eq+fSJ+TBo9OOazM5rPifB5q823dlujQtQMC5bn3mMQ=; b=FHlZz/5qZjgNZmNlKpd7tx3lBcb/hSzo+ddwoYOBQs0y29REYXCf4VwdPpMjiOON4H KyDwBKXUspDiSD/jGBh02esLc5pWIS0MlLIHaufdX5CT3hiUhewvogUnRCHdyiAYXjnN 80XU8iiu3eeYlX5dqNm37Oi5cfimvA4ATOgOHRSjJ1fODHDAzycSTd5Yzedc/SRGeaNG eC8D9UPsIZPI+TDLj7HN0a9SkS8AqNt3E7JiaId9rBczRPQ4tsXYsaqjLc8wtvHpM6NT DuRz96wYNzdnjDJwaNsjKKKmlAYafzih2iEBI5IAEtX25p99p2hwUDR6AJM1oLsWdmUJ 6Stw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eq+fSJ+TBo9OOazM5rPifB5q823dlujQtQMC5bn3mMQ=; b=pVS3FAeXKN9YPrEPh9ihU3Sgmdyzeo/uF+Pft8ISn70fYq6sFcJgnFbZ1nnyvWSXZ4 klUYFFZUruIQcWVFdBcNajQVcMFt3HkxwBr6vQJM7C3cRugxnVCxy6355ajDHMQAH+bB 4YS59EA/fcpbdGFcM4Ew/LXDa9hmdUFnr6F/Xt3N5WT9JFfQcGulwC26P6NAy+3PZC1C olXUBUHwaxP2zgF+Rfs+m8IWN32NuLYbw6nJtLxOE/OIXnz2dDMWhBAKuW7uUPoKyagL WjudMdB/bWMvNSrHgJ6wiyYIRK4V2DunmjpJY0QBIwNZw7zmAue7mm6M5mgnRUYuFHVy 2G1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Fcnqm1yV3Ey1B2bre5CuovWbHEHxEU5ukMH2VsyuOys6LtFNo VC+OW1rJ1fmH+DiyK5Ut5NE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9SMIB9Wqk5V3EYLdp6Y71nG9IjlQ5tr036t7xzjGDkejoDSXXaikpOCniKB5RkP/gZR54Uw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b82:0:b0:207:b4c9:2293 with SMTP id n2-20020a5d6b82000000b00207b4c92293mr12555165wrx.33.1650389529324; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:c704:c814:c0c4:b617]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x16-20020a5d4450000000b00207a459ca80sm14648717wrr.99.2022.04.19.10.32.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <83a6chuke0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:07:35 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288677 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:07:35 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> I don=CA=BCt think our test suite has support for compiling C progra= ms >> (Emacs C modules yes, but not standalone programs). Eli> You could perhaps use Emacs as such a "C program"? Yes, except that running emacs from emacs doesn=CA=BCt fail the way the example program does =F0=9F=99=82 Robert --=20