From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87a67kjqqw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <165875050243.3275.8867100069985547389@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220725120142.D1283C0F203@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87r1298hxp.fsf@gmail.com> <864jz513nb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h735dpno.fsf@gnu.org> <86tu75doeq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <867d41dlc8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ilnk8fuc.fsf@gmail.com> <86o7w2196j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtbkkdb5.fsf@gmail.com> <867d2ol9yl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87edwwjrp4.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilm8s6xh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32390"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 31 18:58:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTR2o-0008J1-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:58:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTR2n-0002Nn-Cm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTR1Q-0008S1-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434]:43597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTR1P-0007Jl-0I; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id u18so6412420wrq.10; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:56:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=sxscww1udhEOLiTNVqjdnhCgdI9kloh9FEuhXTqD7L0=; b=j1q2KNVtnQN8Yw9nAFDygCMp4+LQde1IBcqbfGAS5ySs+R5lYojGsWx70OmNgEF3pd 5ilaP/uL7KBL5rr0GNtDiMLtP0rWwL2Y/xYpNoTXmSEDtKG7UmZjIJUcYBQPWDhMMrB8 /lV8skOyY/MYMip8zkoiPCCdj7ah+SFHh88DEGvCk+ZBor7RXnnBSOpXrF/jRZemTFen z6UJwq5JSU3Y1jxXuZ6tzdsk4Pi6R8vEzFpCD5HfwQn1GJqGuIJJ8iTiEBzFn6e6D4Cv G0IE1ir9wSx3my8sjMWlSfx/n1vUeqvlSsVHp0OOIlOJnr761Pv7W+52BJT6T66hchwC IKzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=sxscww1udhEOLiTNVqjdnhCgdI9kloh9FEuhXTqD7L0=; b=5Y4CWFe+4o0AOxwbmB7mI/hnZ4VdPscJAJgq+KMr5ZcuWHvJmcTg2tVVpd3dYTxOuj wEHPCLVO948XdS4u0vOHrRJzrnK/2PP6yLL31Rls6EHI5rP6GmT7Zcban4BKnyHE9H81 PmSAyEKQCwo7srrxADRRDJ91xHL7VC6k9ND6l/VvAkVRI9IlwVlSVo2URKDL8vATMZ/V hACeVrq3yyarKJLgAyXZo8Aax/PqcImQYoqFPZOrEs4ApDG4PFxvMMJi03qzhom399OK Xb270KZUxprgxUep0MAjRv4mD73/7Kr9D+mmC9z//Kr62JkaD+8HrQtiO8MyI+69as7J iwWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo34jC9/qPac5iRWRjMXfxpqCnRGhG6t5FMgeUYp0mBhwA8uT0oy hvMiHTJYIBjfFk4HKaNYyPVXO0To8nk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR58vNgW2GE9ie9QkCUvvD7WE7IwiTXC4kMu5JceoK14UUKHdKbMtPD27T12rjwo7ssQn808rg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6c6b:0:b0:225:dde:ab40 with SMTP id r11-20020a5d6c6b000000b002250ddeab40mr12474462wrz.690.1661965016579; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:34fb:6aed:1aac:5cee]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o21-20020a05600c4fd500b003a32297598csm2934522wmq.43.2022.08.31.09.56.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ilm8s6xh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:40:10 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::434; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x434.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294446 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:40:10 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Juri> Wouldn't it be cleaner to use just (read-char-from-minibuffer "Ch= aracter: ") Juri> where you can either type a character directly or use 'C-x 8 RET' Juri> to insert a character by its name. >>=20 >> I guess that works as well, but then you=CA=BCre assuming knowledge = of 'C-x >> 8 RET=CA=BC. I can=CA=BCt come up with a strong argument either ways= , so I=CA=BCm >> going to chicken out here and see what Eli says =E2=98=BA=EF=B8=8F Eli> Eli says that he was mightily surprised to see that just typing a Eli> character at the prompt didn't take that character literally, but Eli> instead interpreted it as a hex codepoint. That pleads for `read-char-from-minibuffer', except that (read-char-from-minibuffer "Character: ") RET C-x 8 RET LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS =3D> [Wrong Answer] which pleads for extending `read-char-by-name' to not do that single character hex thing. Robert --=20