From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change. Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 06:43:25 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5yaxd6a.fsf@posteo.net> References: <168335548287.8529.4912240840977468283@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <83edntfm6e.fsf@gnu.org> <667d5cc1-4a3c-5cd4-21c0-adff89cea769@gutov.dev> <834jopfdwz.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8h4elki.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6sofs02.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0rsebcf.fsf@gnu.org> <875y94f4eo.fsf@posteo.net> <834joodmaw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7mwgd1x.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1m0c4zq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs88gc5a.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfc7cbnx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz3b6j6l.fsf@posteo.net> <838rdzc4zf.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz38fz8d.fsf@posteo.net> <87ild04fdt.fsf@posteo.net> <4e37dc2f-2642-cea2-152c-1c387ae82c6a@gutov.dev> <87h6sj2us4.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 12 08:44:02 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pxMVV-00099L-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 May 2023 08:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxMV3-0002iz-8k; Fri, 12 May 2023 02:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxMV1-0002fd-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2023 02:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxMUz-0006Nq-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2023 02:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41622401A9 for ; Fri, 12 May 2023 08:43:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1683873807; bh=A+nqkQi6IQUzz9JnviQcmEoEH5Jd4V2la9Vtdjpj36w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=gLHWbfQ00G3uSjSu+UwDDUVzBAsks7XdUu/VhXN5QJcxlfpu+QStFNEZYk09JVNeK 9NAHjURXytBLn0pGlykn5Y/dsd1h66z0pxyR/K5ech9NbDoBMrvld0VflgXSVRP4n4 Vlsmlm9MIkWDZcP9HNCo68BrNg6ezBMq6xqKfcncIVEI+MAPlhZQ8lM5jEuRYu2FBu ZbGvnYeL14bv5UV7eXEauSnf64MAVP8RtXJkRbuUeBogXO07D4jX6r3nGYb35ZIRR4 mXDxclzW1Rn9x67JHIVEag67c259GiKQgdDDixIlrqz7eS+C7MiSoXhJHSZdY+4DcY pmVa/l1E/dNDQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4QHfNZ0hD2z6tm4; Fri, 12 May 2023 08:43:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 11 May 2023 12:43:36 +0300") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306075 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 11/05/2023 10:26, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> Dmitry Gutov writes: >> >>> On 10/05/2023 14:03, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >>>> I noticed a bug, here is a revised version: >>> Should package-upgrade-all have a similar adjustment? >> Why not? Didn't you have a patch that extended >> `package--upgradeable-packages' by an optional argument, we could use >> that here an just pass `package-install-upgrade-built-in'. > > I'd be happy to see commit 53cc61d60db backported from master. In that case I guess it is better to leave it alone. > Not crazy about the idea of adding a prefix argument to > package-upgrade, though.