From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:05:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5vsmilt.fsf@localhost> References: <6CB5E709-8F5A-4015-9F2C-337A87916C66@gmail.com> <909FC7C1-5473-4746-97E4-B067E6C2B271@gmail.com> <5382C438-D871-4C79-820C-DCA17C59CBCA@gmail.com> <87wmyy2u79.fsf@localhost> <87mszt305f.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22384"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , emacs-devel To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 19 10:06:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qM2CR-0005da-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:06:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qM2Br-0003lE-L1; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 04:05:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qM2Bn-0003kv-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 04:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qM2BZ-0000VY-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 04:05:39 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DF4240101 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:05:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1689753923; bh=HfG9ElnLGe5sLnsPOkWD0xQQR7fE4aikN0ldEDJ6Euc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=fIBVOiZj4r1kBhgJRnlp0ZkOrsN1cuT7FslekI9xoMLVNMBOukwH3FM0rWUf5AHGo tuUl90gvkTAt2gvZ1nZ/V5ilOVCoGsccqqxeMZNL7fKgJORwtXPHgMydp3wWCkbhEo mZyrtForKarbsk/qdQKjtz7sNIgG3Ef07uAy0hN1dcj49x/xaBR3b2mDqjoRODSCyX lle7Hhv6FZe2kK61I8TXAc+L8wVznGgndpB4I3xeWjUvGOHpXF6nW1JlOMxcjfxs+P VDS0w4l7iavUyDpJME1b2aYIKM0whRJWPsfh03P3W2nmZ48SQ3VIQ9kCg2vHDMD63D EkBznA2YsEG7A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R5Szk6Kygz9rxb; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:05:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307965 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > If you know helm well, can you say whether or not it handles function > structure explicitly? Doing things like assuming the element of a > lambda form following 'lambda is the parameter list? This might be the > cause of the problem. No idea, sorry. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at