From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab? Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87a5pbw2ly.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14095"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:L2fmne9FWDkUGlzx37QqbiPR/LE= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 12 08:01:12 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBXU-0003Xg-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:01:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBX8-00017K-F4; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rO9wv-0005DL-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:19:21 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rO9wt-00041e-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:19:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rO9wr-0001kO-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:19:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:00:44 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314888 Archived-At: tomas wrote: > In other words: you seem to be convinced that Yor Way is the > Right Way. Nothing wrong with that. But you don't seem > willing to listen to others why they think Their Way seems > the Right Way for them. Optimally one would have systems that are interface-agnostic to the point everyone could use whatever they wanted to access the same thing. E-mail, interactive homepages, smartphone services, whatever the future holds. The data would be packaged and repackaged and bounced between those systems so that everyone could both contribute and "consume" material in their prefered way. Yet another protocol or gateway, or maybe half a dozen, but still shouldn't be that hard to do in terms of computing? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal