From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: M-g in dired Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:47:47 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <878xwap86u.fsf@jurta.org> References: <873bnf36mr.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130745639 6130 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2005 08:00:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 31 09:00:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWUZc-0002Zi-76 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:59:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWUZb-0006Ry-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWUV6-0005a1-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:54:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWUV2-0005Yx-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWUV1-0005Yj-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EWUV1-0003hZ-9G; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-35-70-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.35.70]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15537C838; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:54:46 +0200 (EET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:14:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45159 Archived-At: > BTW, there is a bug related to key suggestions: `M-x next-error RET' > typed in a dired buffer suggests the key binding `M-g n' even though > `M-g' is not a prefix key in dired buffers. > > That seems like a bug. where-is-internal should never suggest a key > which isn't really bound to the desired command. > > ISTR there is code in where-is-internal that tries to verify this. > If so, that code must now be broken. I am overwhelmed now; could > someone please try debugging this? where-is-internal verifies only the whole key sequence, but it seems that verifying if a shorter key can shadow a key sequence is not implemented. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/