From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikhail Gusarov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode font-backend + tiling Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:21:52 +0600 Message-ID: <878xhlusdb.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> References: <87ejrffa4k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165433117 1788 80.91.229.10 (6 Dec 2006 19:25:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 06 20:25:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gs2OJ-0000mt-Mj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:25:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gs2OJ-0003np-5J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Grvmg-0006w4-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Grvmf-0006uG-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Grvme-0006uA-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:21:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [85.118.226.168] (helo=dottedmag.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Grvme-00014P-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:21:56 -0500 Original-Received: from frontier.dottedmag.net (frontier.dottedmag.net [10.10.30.20]) by dottedmag.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4563C1BEC2 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 18:21:52 +0600 (NOVT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Tue\, 05 Dec 2006 15\:07\:05 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:23:51 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63374 Archived-At: You (miles.bader@necel.com) wrote: MB> However I've _also_ just tried my test in gnome-terminal and some MB> other gnome apps, and they do the same thing (use AA always, even MB> for CJK) in the "body" text. However the same programs use MB> non-AA CJK text in menus etc.! So I don't know where that MB> decision is getting made.... MB> Firefox on the other hand, even its "body" text, uses AA at small MB> sizes, non-AA at normal sizes, and AA at big sizes, which I MB> gather is the desired behavior. Apps have the power to override the decision made in fontconfig. I suppose both gnome-terminal and Firefox do use it. Not sure such override is a good thing. --