From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: netrc field encryption in auth-source Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:47:28 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878vt52ykv.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762ptue8r.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4e8ucw3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyofwxp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5cfui5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyndz5l.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739jogwf9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lix9eknu.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308001706 991 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2011 21:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:48:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 13 23:48:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEze-0007gI-5N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:48:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEzc-0007VF-NI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEz5-0007UE-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:47:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEz0-0004i5-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEz0-0004hx-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWEyx-0007Lj-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:47:39 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:47:39 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:47:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/Y1ciAaKUbwAIpGQ4Hy2xUCnsU0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140437 Archived-At: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:05:57 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:02:02 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> I'll do my best to implement the new smtpmail.el stuff on Wednesday, LMI> which looks like it's going to be free. Is there any possibility of LMI> getting the gpg: tokens done before that? :-) TZ> See the attached patch. I really hope the nasty code in there will TZ> inspire you or Daiki Ueno to tell me how to do it better. It depends on TZ> the EPA being active and tries to load it opportunistically. It also TZ> depends on symmetric encryption to be enabled. If you want this done by Wednesday (including the creation code), please let me know if my code looked OK and if you find the interface acceptable. I won't be able to do it in time otherwise. Thanks Ted