From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding rationale? Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:59:57 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878vlbyu7m.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326502824 22257 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2012 01:00:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:00:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 02:00:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryj-0002Vt-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryj-0002aH-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryf-0002Zw-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryd-0005Xc-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryd-0005XQ-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlryb-0002Sz-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:09 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:09 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJmwV1irjKZJAxSv/uMbBryr8qY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147654 Archived-At: On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:28:53 -0500 Dave Abrahams wrote: DA> My initial reaction when I heard about this was that we should have DA> a set of functions/macros for lexical binding, e.g. (lex-let ((a DA> b)(c d)) (body)) but then, as I say, I may have misunderstood what DA> was happening. Wait, you know about `lexical-let', right? Ted