From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vitalie Spinu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:13:05 +0200 Message-ID: <878ud3q3u6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3r5wqwv.fsf@gnu.org> <553EBBBF.6070509@yandex.ru> <838udcwbdc.fsf@gnu.org> <553FFC99.5080701@yandex.ru> <834mnzuedd.fsf@gnu.org> <554161A8.30202@yandex.ru> <83618du3q3.fsf@gnu.org> <5542E486.2010107@yandex.ru> <83k2wsssm8.fsf@gnu.org> <5543632C.6000306@yandex.ru> <834mnwsbfb.fsf@gnu.org> <554392E2.7080109@yandex.ru> <83oam4qh2u.fsf@gnu.org> <5543C97C.6050000@yandex.ru> <83h9rwqf10.fsf@gnu.org> <5543E3CF.5010402@yandex.ru> <87r3qwpiif.fsf@gmail.com> <5547E5D0.7000307@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430784805 2276 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2015 00:13:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 00:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 02:13:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YpQUF-00035o-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 02:13:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpQUE-00015W-Im for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpQU3-00015R-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpQU2-0006MQ-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:34252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpQTy-0006L9-Sc; Mon, 04 May 2015 20:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so88607787wic.1; Mon, 04 May 2015 17:13:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=x26L9NPAL61lo4zBAu0KCcpyPEf6BdYN3RNSkwDGo00=; b=KDWRGefZXzj8qsP8Qt3YP9CDU5tcchNHJfow6vT1qN4rd/l0kHUzGrXEYy1ITNXj7d 2HsIoWida/a88FHa/0UpnqeLfnq61NwkkwJZJ4T8kF3+qfRb78tVHoO3nQhB43wujIOJ GI1bEBZvXzOVwb2l0apQSvlfYLj9N1eE1A6KSdFFrJx1g1Xf2ar8ZlPjpBBpa0o77Hsd VH3md8X9hd1ZDye5RzAM45zyOlHfKi2FaRq78uGe7VfOZ8Rj9AGz42FYc/joZgCV7j8h 4RcW/9iiBCx7bujUzlZ8KAD5f0CfhXoH0/6FaScM+pWSSXXIdRPpoKB/6S8XqpyLIXkU awoQ== X-Received: by 10.180.86.69 with SMTP id n5mr374954wiz.91.1430784786330; Mon, 04 May 2015 17:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (dhcp-077-251-128-242.chello.nl. [77.251.128.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ng5sm13414351wic.24.2015.05.04.17.13.05 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 May 2015 17:13:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5547E5D0.7000307@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 5 May 2015 00:34:08 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186217 Archived-At: >>> Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 5 May 2015 00:34:08 +0300 wrote: > I'd rather not concern myself with this kind of complexity. However, > if you're fine with merge logic simply concatenating the results (and > it will be hard to do better), this shouldn't be hard to implement on > top of the basic one-backend-at-a-time xref system, in a minor mode. Sure thing. I can do the mode. How about the basic merging? Would it be possible for you to put some basic stuff together? Vitalie