From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Severe lossage from unread-command-events Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:34:08 +0200 Message-ID: <878u9jf0wv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87egjh4u1h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83pp30sd5l.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2t831gf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tfgl0e2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wpx8jigl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pp2vf5f9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fv3roxlf.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1yvf339.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1yvovoi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439231733 26527 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2015 18:35:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 20:35:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOruw-0002Os-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:35:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOruv-0004tz-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrur-0004rY-EV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOruq-0001n1-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOruq-0001mx-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41044 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrup-0005fW-Sr; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40E74DF35F; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:34:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83d1yvovoi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:17:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188702 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: David Kastrup >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:47:06 +0200 >> >> > I was waiting for you to tell whether it solves all the problems you >> > know about with pushing events onto unread-command-events. If you are >> > satisfied by what you see after applying the patch, I will push. >> >> So far the results looked good. I suspect that it does nothing about >> the "escaping e" problem of Artur. And I suspect that the "(cons t" >> feature will (still?) not work reliably. However, neither of those >> problems would appear to be caused by your patch, so there seems little >> point in delaying that patch. > > Pushed. > > Thanks for testing the patch. Not at all. It makes the difference between macro recording on Midi events being mostly useless and being useful. And if one is recording multi-channel data (and an accordion regular sends on three channels: right hand melody, left hand chords, and left hand basses), being able to replay with different keymaps in order to separate one take into various Voice contexts is pretty important. In the long run, at least the user interface for recording facilities will probably be look different from C-x ( ... C-x ) but without even the basics working, there is not much of an incentive for people to work on the trickier stuff. -- David Kastrup