From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-number-mode at EOB Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:04:16 +0200 Message-ID: <878tjlc04f.fsf@rosalinde> References: <83tw35thxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw35cc70.fsf@rosalinde> <83injktb9p.fsf@gnu.org> <87k240xhk6.fsf@rosalinde> <87k236vh7p.fsf_-_@rosalinde> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500386679 29457 195.159.176.226 (18 Jul 2017 14:04:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:04:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 18 16:04:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXT75-0007SK-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:04:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXT7A-0007z0-To for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXT6y-0007yA-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXT6u-0004aN-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:04:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXT6u-0004Zi-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([83.135.16.220]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaGfK-1duCCd3Lh8-00m25T; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:04:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:16:34 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2vg0JmT7JUySAqiYCrdUMrv/+Hi9Gbxa6v2Lo21GLoWaC9ds28w j7bcF5PUj3NvsCj+G738m2AwOFeetNwdA89+blHQh3MBGCv+HyKZrKz0KxqvAt2DbQ455K/ ANhI51TtyUTMyw0bNPIfbFZB0HoOoCYcJl3REw6JtG6DiTlKiARDa+YETy5C80A0i9WJBoE mmoSKZZIAwqfFHSEqyNBg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:La/Gm4ia9jw=:HNmvbgnNFrlxsfiw6iZ0LC ts7KFS099JdVWXP/LxyCd5zcIPvFwcLJjC4eUF+alCXjyB50wJXLUVbcB6vCYhI5vZc4yVhxo 3tlcBXusR4aEu0RnQmdw1piPK00i2IOfP63XuaYxeB7J8oZSgjrfQyExCbQZOz2kjDHJp+7gm DQj/GrsMQIynvGlWHqpyaTemgHf7jntCJ4nNxKcpWAhX/TByoi6v63qiYdU2IB3hwk2+oc0q6 tt9T7kOe3x6YX+irsUGClrz7g/gY4vOc/NNNHvONSa1k/DkA1b+XR8neXmsVyPERY1YSZ/hrc RIAn4eQXjKZKJJ/WFfXkn7DmcbOya/rukqxurgGiV6MQl5Ty0hHrGdIC4S8hTrMqkq66CSyUp Mxe1JMY8nXk1g78WJazoxIfU0z+znvhKxf2PEzl/MftsZT7rCJ5TEHs4uMkAlcIfBMgFkJgbD o6EjlCmYjwvfBvpwy0dIAD0s43i38hJvnrFKQlSW3T6JJyb/vFYMJzs7YZAk+oUV/0IFq9Dus bn4HR0ANHujy6LBwcZ2Sz2MuVsBeMgOePqEpOM0b+wizz/XNbSemBpYOOC9npzU12lilakve2 4LNQXT2fq6cSdKBK6JVG42dQa1pI3QTwJJR4dZOxCDKJ0uwB6JwOl9Qr+NNoo3oqyr4JElgTQ /WeUT3tcevgNx5p7OCqYj8ShGqUcRR5k5G3EdVu0hz+MHVThbU1vmEZYdhT5llF6R2dD5GRq5 wx9u04IDMPKVyd+7WfhPRaLNJvgip+8JQLWm+T3zlgB2FxvmsjDeugtv4jXqa6PKH87G96Jg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216831 Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:16:34 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If this change is accepted, then the command `what-line' should probably >> also be changed to return "EOB" at EOB. (Such a change makes sense even > > This seems rather undesirable (same for the %l change to display EOB > rather than the line number). Why (in both cases)? Does it cause some misbehavior or is it otherwise problematic? Steve Berman