From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Undo boundaries inside macros? Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:36:28 +0100 Message-ID: <878takm8ar.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521732891 17578 195.159.176.226 (22 Mar 2018 15:34:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:34:51 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 22 16:34:46 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ez2En-0004T0-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:34:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ez2Gq-00065d-Gw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ez2Ga-00064M-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ez2GW-0003Gs-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]:47099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ez2GW-0003Gg-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s10so9141335wra.13 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:36:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:mail-followup-to:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:message-id:mime-version; bh=rd2TOkyWh/DLWEbRiwjUgeMcux2QsCPTAIY5IlzXZ5A=; b=vOlK/7ZW1Bl8tHTdNi4wEua+nOzV+24n4y8l1S2iamUVDqpnBGQAYrg47ufzNAMr0s P6jKS8mJZDfXVeruJ0C7HNZkgJHEF1JL+C/dhIYDv+UD9hTU8KL9vgIuRYinKnFBvkYo XrPJDN/aE+QAvQW/snERtQPF+WNFODTrqhzMpIa4q7jyl7yAyapZQIGUqDh3rOhbnLnH tlO0Eflv3T0O7+u7fsRXBSAiRm6xOQyng8jeJcvwfm3Tsl5uEB2wUYtCyCoOoJv0ggD8 Y2M2ROBfKm8LOfrmsHsk2Ap3RnKNCKViKUeAxqWNyc+jAnyeObzAgu3JcpS7h1xxOGvY +mvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:mail-followup-to:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=rd2TOkyWh/DLWEbRiwjUgeMcux2QsCPTAIY5IlzXZ5A=; b=sP+QO7tQuXa7wsaRtm+f+Jvx92gtCy9Uw78ssPKJnntCrWYOGGz1+v+NLZUrdscV3Y k/NugH817QQIaRQg6P5ndBNyuISgcMAM2JZz4t7o1Yv984jenC1Oofk4PckEbHokAApr HYKADZWhTbiUuGBdU3zeOX3dnliCU1Sf/0tK6H5Hdd+9qWQTeroXpG6WIydkXIWstgIU ThA4L88uI2CBzN91aKqh4Q6AiFb65xyTZcw5yQ2vQZHGqVrzikLZHhI+a7E2VDeGQdGi fLM+Nf6qariDgKXqK8/33FNQz7o6tDc8J9nb2Va5czODzBsaNaAg9TU3WjD+3E3B8hU4 t52w== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HMyMcA7W1LxpiJh8uqqdpLloQ0G3LMCJ4XDDUzxznb+bVJOjKt 9SFxRrwlI05xVXZZC/c4ySvE1zaB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsox1eZv+OrXyG5pH3gpI6tPxoDk+yrW+K/SoUbB1xQXtdLV67vGypMXyJhjL1YYrGIXsaP/A== X-Received: by 10.223.196.212 with SMTP id o20mr19800335wrf.144.1521732991232; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm5192481wre.72.2018.03.22.08.36.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223916 Archived-At: 1 2 C-/ ; this undoes all the effects of the macro 1 RET 2 C-/ ; this only undoes the '2' I was expecting undo to be an all-or-nothing affair, but adding lines introduces an undo boundary inside the macro. It matches what happens when you type '1 RET 2' interactively, but should it? Robert