From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Text property searching Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:42:55 +0200 Message-ID: <878t9lh8ds.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87in8r16b0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87d0yz15a3.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87604r143y.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87604qx4tj.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <20180417191024.GA4739@ACM> <87muy1iqy2.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <20180417203114.GB4739@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523998294 18497 195.159.176.226 (17 Apr 2018 20:51:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:51:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , emacs-devel To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 17 22:51:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XZZ-0004jM-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:51:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33435 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8Xbf-0005Ye-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XRZ-0006WC-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XRU-0007r2-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:43:13 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XRU-0007NQ-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XRO-00059y-4p; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:43:04 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8XRI-0002if-Ay; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:42:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180417203114.GB4739@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:31:14 +0000") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224713 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > Why did you distort my message by snipping essential context? Sorry, I did not know that that was the essential context. > The "this" I was talking about was the correct handling of category > properties in the new functions, not the distinction between an absent > property and a value of nil. I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about category text properties that apparently (according to what someone wrote here) there is a distinction between nil and absence. > Let me put it to you again: you need to deal with category text > properties properly. If you don't, the things I listed in the paragraph > above will surely happen. The new function deals with any text property just the same as `next-single-property-change' and all its friends do; no more nor less, so I may be misunderstanding what you're saying once again. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no