From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 16:56:50 +0200 Message-ID: <878svewe6l.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <87imwhmmt8.fsf@gmail.com> <87y347g1l3.fsf@iotcl.com> <9ac21e82-8e47-f9b5-f88d-23c0c56946d1@yandex.ru> <87pnpc1lby.fsf@iotcl.com> <83zhoezdqc.fsf@gnu.org> <87imuivfcr.fsf@iotcl.com> <83k1eyfxls.fsf@gnu.org> <3b8e2195-07c0-a240-6164-8d34bcca344f@yandex.ru> <83ftpmfp0y.fsf@gnu.org> <838svefl3p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="37571"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 17:00:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70X-0009g6-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70W-0004Fa-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 11:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70K-0004DL-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 11:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70J-0000Fp-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 11:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33204 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70J-0000DA-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 11:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hP70E-0009I2-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:00:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:3lFcRBOUOjHvD3c/m5BIjlm+VAk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236381 Archived-At: Tadeus Prastowo writes: >> > > If you mean the decision whether to click "Reply" or "Reply all" in >> > > the Gmail UI, then yes, the user will have to learn to click the >> > > latter. If that's a burden, then I guess Gmail is not "reasonable". >> > >> > You can surely remember yourself that every once in a while somebody >> > clicks "Reply" instead of "Reply All", because it's an easy mistake to make. >> >> Not so easy, as most people do manage to DTRT. > > Gmail can be configured to default to "Reply All". Asking people to change their MUA defaults just to comply with Emacs' bug tracker requirements is not realistic.