From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [Was: bug#25148:] Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:15:18 +0100 Message-ID: <878soakddl.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <83sgmm4a08.fsf@gnu.org> <87h832xqxr.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191117192558.GC11551@ACM> <87a78uxot6.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a78uuvde.fsf@gnus.org> <8853390e-f4a5-c295-4f94-cf417ec8db5f@yandex.ru> <83wobv2684.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="75710"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 12:19:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXO1Z-000JWi-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:19:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXO1X-0000VU-O3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:19:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXNxH-0005E8-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXNxG-0004Yr-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:56672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXNxF-0004VM-Uw; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:15:26 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXNx9-0006wF-KH; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:15:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wobv2684.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:14:51 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242475 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If we want to support pull requests, there are more things to do than > just the above. I don't think our work flow has to change for pull requests. Of course, if somebody wants to hit the "merge pull request" button in Gitlab, they can do that, but for most smaller pull requests, Gitlab would just email the patch (presumably) and we can apply it locally on our machines before pushing to the repo, just like now. (Like you, that's the work flow I'm comfortable with, because I want to see how Emacs behaves after applying the patch.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no