From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing no-back-reference restriction from syntax-propertize-rules Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 20:54:03 +0200 Message-ID: <878shnycvo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wo5cff39.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv0dayv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1vh2ao7.fsf@gnu.org> <87blmkt5no.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="109976"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 19 20:54:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jb7O0-000SVl-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 20:54:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb7O0-0006Ys-2K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb7NP-00068d-OR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb7NP-00081N-3M; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:41135) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jb7NO-0002sj-Sg; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D9827C0058; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:06 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtjedguddvlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhs ihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhsughhsehgnhhurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpe dtleeiffekueffudeufeefhfeitdejuedtueevgeffgfdtjeelkeehgeekteekveenucfk phepleefrddvfeeirddufeelrddujeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhn rghlihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrgh esfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p5dec8baf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.236.139.175]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8326C3060C1B; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:54:05 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 19 May 2020 11:06:11 -0400") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250974 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> Looks good. IRC you had some tests to along with it. If you could >>> install them at the same time, that would be great. >> Of course. I guess it is ok to only test the shifting function? > > Yes. Done so. >> Or something more elaborate that puts text in a temp buffer, makes >> a syntax-propertize-function with syntax-propertize-rules and checks >> if the 'syntax-table properties get applied as expected? > > Any test is better than no test at this point, so ... take your pick. Right. Maybe I'll add something like the above to the test later on. Now I gotta put the kids in the shower. :-) Bye, Tassilo