From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (gnus) Allow gnus-retrieve-headers to return headers directly Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:57:22 -0800 Message-ID: <878s7tkqjh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17178"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Madhu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 20:58:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeaM-0004Lr-Pr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:58:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54282 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeaL-0004m1-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeZM-0004Ff-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:41976 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeZJ-0003tZ-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (97-113-53-191.tukw.qwest.net [97.113.53.191]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B48A9FA4A0; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:57:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1613159843; bh=7RS+Z/R1u5Y7m9xqazBwtEoBmeC20GYusSI7Ng5grjI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DzYuiGRZCtT1NOFdcVzDsChXO08uR3LQyXel68uJhV2gE7YwRfTZTLDnpqWRH0qEb Vgo1sE4MJvsEEynnZe6MizHrQ38QDN6dVJJdrLVB3fj3NMeBRHjPI+VmFQKXvUlHE8 Zp1j6Rnk7DF4GtN9/bwGEL6Nu0Ud2Vk8ItP2ep6k= In-Reply-To: (Matt Armstrong's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:18 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=52.70.2.18; envelope-from=eric@ericabrahamsen.net; helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264553 Archived-At: Matt Armstrong writes: > Madhu writes: > >> Hello, I believe gnus commit 20add1cd22f977 has introduced some unwanted >> behaviour. Let me describe an example: Assume I have a Group buffer line >> for a foreign group like: >> >> 269: nntp+news.aioe.org:alt.quotations >> >> I enter this group I arrange for it to ask me how many articles to >> read: How many articles: Say I enter 20, I expect to see the last 20 >> messages (unread and ticked). >> >> In this case I have 16 unread messages and 4 ticked articles, so I'd >> see a mode line in the Summary buffer like >> >> -UUU:@----F2 news:a.quotations [0] {16(+253) more} 89% L323 (Summary Plugged) --- >> >> and the Summary buffer would display only 20 lines. >> >> However all ticked and cached articles are inserted in the Summary >> buffer. So in this case I have some 400 Summary lines, while it should >> have been only 20. Can anyone confirm this regression? > > +cc Eric for comment (he might have missed that this was a question > about his commit). I've already reverted these changes! They're going to take a little more thought, and a lot more testing, which I haven't found time to do yet. Hopefully next weekend... Thanks, Eric