From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 42596bd 2/6: Little improvements in rmail.el. Recognize encryped override headers. Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:47:35 +0200 Message-ID: <878s4khs2w.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20210512030946.27770.7288@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210512030948.6448F21128@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87a6p0kuxi.fsf@gnus.org> <8335us3xkh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33033"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 17:53:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrBN-0008Q7-33 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 17:53:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42750 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrBM-0008Ls-1I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgr5J-00008c-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:47:41 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:49738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgr5I-0001Rw-1u; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:47:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KJNVWYzFoPmjUxlvWR7kRwj8sVTEh7Wb/f8yIFYSraM=; b=ZfEK+VYptsUNZORwlBWkRI9VD0 rHz1HUsCGmCURrWXC0qSWL3+GkVahkNeV7e8OqJQ8AzJfidrw+iWDxK2DGOZrtBvag9f2PPkOzasa ZG6+Zwwe96UOvnK2smQcDS1lG0gqrYh+IHNCJdFUeGjrVbkJDMg+z1t48sTN8xHTK4Tw=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgr5D-0006Jd-Ih; Wed, 12 May 2021 17:47:37 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Live in Alberobello, Italy_: "Allemande Bleu-Courante Marocaine" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:47 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269213 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > But this shouldn't be embedded directly into the code. > We should have instead a variable specifying those cases (so it can be > extended/adjusted depending on the cases the users face). Yup. There's a gazillion ways subject headers can be mangled, and it's pretty odd of an Emacs mail user agent to do one particular obscure fix-up just because it's one mangling that Emacs maintainers have to deal with. What if there's users out there that really want to see that [EXTERNAL] thing, because their incoming MTA adds it, and it's corporate policy to have those markings on mail that arrives from outside? Suddenly they get a stern talking-to from HR. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no