From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrei Kuznetsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:31:13 +0800 Message-ID: <878s1qsgym.fsf@163.com> References: <8735rzyzbz.fsf@163.com> <86v94v3xh9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87wnpargnb.fsf@elite.giraud> <87h7gey7zx.fsf@163.com> <83pmv2twrl.fsf@gnu.org> <875ywuvauv.fsf@163.com> <83lf5qtvpd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4179"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 15:32:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jff-0000yN-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:32:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58594 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jfe-0005Ru-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:32:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jea-0004eg-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:31:20 -0400 Original-Received: from m12-18.163.com ([220.181.12.18]:36500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jeY-0002nb-2v; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:31:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=7JcxC O/gjqqCr9wU5E0c2G0xp/oFMDOY/4hZprGOFH8=; b=LwnRdw/MiX1uod7h7NFnU MJHMfT/pQNkMFrP82cXL2aTbo6ycGTcYVBvnARBXmSA6JlW65DrTaf2ToKP1ouVh DHfoPOTiIJ2sUisb5j17z2ORIAOrUqEnaB18mXmsRczjaZhnJc8WFHAT406udIqk PMlV7ICwCvgLkzGjrHAJ1k= Original-Received: from po-lus-librem-15 (unknown [61.172.31.87]) by smtp14 (Coremail) with SMTP id EsCowAAHCe8hXAFhkP3Www--.62002S2; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:31:14 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <83lf5qtvpd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:27:26 +0300") X-CM-TRANSID: EsCowAAHCe8hXAFhkP3Www--.62002S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrWFyUAFyxArWfur43CrWDtwb_yoWxXrcE9r yUJr9ayw47KF4IyFyftF1UGryktws0kF17Ja97Zryxtwn3XF4rWr4kZ3ZIvF47GF4fGr12 9wnFy3W7t3y7WjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU03rcDUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [61.172.31.87] X-CM-SenderInfo: rurskkarusmjiyx6il2tof0z/1tbiMgLdpFWBuzrWagAAsg Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.181.12.18; envelope-from=r12451428287@163.com; helo=m12-18.163.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_HEX=0.006, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271740 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If you want to modify a TS grammar file, you can (not in C). But why > would you want to? The whole point of using TS is NOT to require that > the Emacs development team or Emacs users should know enough about > parsing of the many languages Emacs supports to modify the grammar. > We want another, independent development team to take care of that, > and we want to use the results of their development with minimum > fuss. Exactly like we do with other libraries developed by other > projects: the image libraries, GnuTLS, HarfBuzz, etc. Interesting perspective. Thanks for the clarification