From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better emoji support Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: <878rzrjrgs.fsf@gmail.com> References: <834kd2cypw.fsf@gnu.org> <87v95itsc4.fsf@gmail.com> <831r86cxdy.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6kgejp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnnkpjj9.fsf@gmail.com> <3E0155F6-D681-4443-A1D9-472D1836168D@traduction-libre.org> <87bl4rnyoe.fsf@gmail.com> <877dffnwf5.fsf@gmail.com> <875yuzciaf.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuijm9uy.fsf@gmail.com> <87lf3v2dz4.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilywl8tx.fsf@gmail.com> <877dfcz6zu.fsf@gmail.com> <83mto73mem.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee9jhint.fsf@gmail.com> <838rzr3fhm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7efk5c3.fsf@gmail.com> <83y27r1sku.fsf@gnu.org> <87czp3jt5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83lf3r1j8h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32061"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 15:42:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJYY-00089p-Sf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:42:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJYX-0006xg-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJWi-0004tF-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:40561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJWh-0007ac-Dt; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id q26so29797114wrc.7; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:40:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ujBhuUtheXy2/UlQBCOEqkaj+K0KfakE2lA6PwWW9ek=; b=mO9o55YSNzQmG/EbzVVEF1OQt1SB19VYykZGW2mK70O7QVHWS3wF3RihsHh/AwCe5+ sVQKz5VrfKzQ13eb2jHcStsp6J5vEGiXtXcV06o4vfv/pKVWqA91ZPcOLAT20dInbv8s 3J98x6N1iaY0RqdCJHmWJmOuwn2B9uWsBuBrZfov5tmGvBKLzdCqgOXEgpT2wx3yWyRV 8XiaG07KaynP39WABsa1OUltfqQHRZUhEfD2Uagjj1RFBe+7b5arLUziFLFwwMy7Bmqu SPTyAF+9aSnvbGFaHJzuTfqjLL6Nr+ec+UVvfiCWl4JklpWgR8WobNLPhhEVSDhZwe2p sCIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ujBhuUtheXy2/UlQBCOEqkaj+K0KfakE2lA6PwWW9ek=; b=SRDAAYjg7qJOwuuFHwL5HY7HqIMGt5FGdhEtw+Dq3VXPDViBOFlZtDX2ULGoNsICJk rAbr+mGpEmvH8gtCGjNH885gD+nzuWUpdE3v+7lI4Ls2Q03Hz+AYezmM3W3sd72Hv2SA 5GxeRbG7Lrx2mbKLhnq1OIbEOFyvTu1GtD9wfyKEIFM4DvIr0eBefdc+65E4c/UOcPca dQn7NDslzBWiHavWyvjpnFsQvtRgd2Sj46hHCmk4k5YU5m2CS4xc3d60J8gghKQwXVnL u67zGJrlh+9NzhAmnSl43cVoPIa8hOJOU9hJE55hq1kvNg+KqgZKmEv1LjPZrvM4gYkK vNOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532y8o4TS84fVBf4ZFhbtT9b4MtfmWh2wlBimkfgjgoM4YEF0T88 p89Ny7RBwd3d3GWwEmGULV0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzayI0GMsjzQ8iD9Em4kjMtO13xv2cmFZ4gJwydO2H1F/sy1PawvmelexA11ZpmDJZhu2Xrsg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f02:: with SMTP id c2mr29125352wru.10.1632145204994; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm16635594wra.38.2021.09.20.06.40.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:40:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lf3r1j8h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:15:10 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275131 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:15:10 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> So we get to pick our poison: complete consistency with the >> Emoji_Presentation property from emoji-data.txt, or having complete >> coverage for emoji-zwj-sequences.txt. Eli? (I=CA=BCll admit to havin= g a >> slight preference for the latter, given that I find Emoji_Presentati= on >> to be somewhat arbitrary for quite a few codepoints) Eli> I agree: we should use the latter, at least for now. OK. I can finish that up tonight, I think. Robert --=20