From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: project-find-file: switch to include non-tracked files Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:24:09 +0000 Message-ID: <878rz9jana.fsf@posteo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel To: Manuel Uberti Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 13:28:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXM8Y-0002D9-Aq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 13:28:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXM8X-0003yj-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXM6L-0002nc-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:43739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXM4t-0007NX-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467D7240103 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 13:24:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1633346651; bh=lvrn8I5YnC0YAA537r6x6gqE8dtlSvsnvoDOTsUJQBM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=aecWg1ZY4hdGn92N09UBejGBUVHZyHhs5BYgK+jPPYbqc91oV+K0QAk9MyCTdk469 tF8h4U4EqiZ3u2kGC37thPJxzBY8yQ1Cw3AypMfkIOTCweHsgIcdjb9ZOBFZDkiBOp 7fFib3MoPxLTPorPH90uiK4+FbU5Bfj6Dd/qlc30x4M229FE90/Q5ycDAtqNVpOVWi y1Xb6i2iXuuQlsYEHOqUAR+576CuJCEMfgAqpLhu++zC01ndByIPwwk3TVYNaCf6R3 uo0DNAQdUf22Q29dKhZkid+IZPuxxiXxwZc81eZswteaVm63hq8xCQFG/SeMmc4ecq t3K7xWEvJyXsg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HNJJV1l86z9rxF; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 13:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: (Manuel Uberti's message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:33:51 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276170 Archived-At: Manuel Uberti writes: > Sorry to bring up this again, but is there anything that can be done on this? > > The proposed solution with C-u C-x p f seems very reasonable to me, I > don't know what others project.el users think though. I agree, my only concern is if there might be a better use for C-u that we aren't seeing right now. -- Philip Kaludercic