From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving ergonomics of repeat-maps: define-repeat-map Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 04:05:15 -0500 Message-ID: <878rz9gnxw.fsf@alphapapa.net> References: <874katproz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7etsjxx.fsf@gnus.org> <446cdb8d-7075-4942-bfbe-74653dd32a03@www.fastmail.com> <875yudqjwi.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 11:37:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXKPa-0004SW-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:37:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXKPY-0007zb-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 05:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXJuW-000655-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 05:05:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:52890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXJuU-0007oH-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 05:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXJuS-0003Ot-0G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:05:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276160 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >>> Heh. I've got a `define-keymap' macro stashed away, waiting for Emacs >>> 29. :-) (So another week or so.) >> >> I would /love/ to see this! It would greatly ease my own efforts :) > > That was a very long week, but it's now pushed to the trunk. Thanks, this will be very useful. I'm confused about a small detail, though: it seems that define-keymap allows keyword/value pairs inline with the key/binding pairs, but defvar-keymap requires the keyword/value pairs to be in a list, and an empty one when none are given. The manual entry doesn't seem to cover this difference.