From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dark mode on Windows Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:31:45 +0200 Message-ID: <878ryhjnf2.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87mtmx3nsx.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ee893nl4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ee89kcpn.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r1c9ybau.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21787"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:nVfE0jWwI/hYhpWmRQ3WCDPyW94= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 15:11:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mezlK-0005Pq-Uv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:11:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mezlI-0005wm-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mez8w-0001KO-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:40920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mez8u-0002Mx-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mez8r-0004aH-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:31:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277745 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Óscar Fuentes writes: > >> KDE and other window managers I use on GNU/Linux set themselves the >> window decorations, not the application. Is GTK an exception to that? > > Yes, GTK+ 3.0 provides the ability to use a different style (such as > Adwatia Dark) for window decorations (and GTK+ widgets in general). That's the same I was saying about KDE. > AFAIK that if the window does not have client-side decorations, it is > automatically converted to use them. Emacs has no client-side window decorations, right? More specifically, it does not sets the background of the title frame. >> Supporting ancient OSes is not a requirement for accepting patches that >> implement new capabilities. > > IIUC, this does not just implement new capabilities, but will prevent > Emacs from working at all on older systems. False. Emacs has lots of features that don't work on old systems. Emacs runs on those systems with those features disabled. >> Of course it doesn't work on "slightly old" versions of Windows, because >> them lack the feature, as the OP implicitly informs us when he says >> "Windows 10 has..." > > Yes, but the function is not dynamically loaded. This will cause symbol > resolution failures on older systems. This can be fixed, Emacs already does that on lots of places, moreso when it runs on Windows. >> Why such discouraging review? > > I wasn't trying to discourage the OP, just to help. That was not the tone I perceived from here.