From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Implementing image support for kitty terminal Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:43:32 +0200 Message-ID: <878rmtcwrv.fsf@logand.com> References: <87v8pz18wf.fsf@mail.jao.io> <83o7vrgimc.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnafdnee.fsf@logand.com> <835yhzgdyi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k06den1s.fsf@logand.com> <87illxy5ir.fsf@mail.jao.io> <87sfl1d1wi.fsf@logand.com> <87czc5y1wp.fsf@mail.jao.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29982"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jose A Ortega Ruiz , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 09 00:44:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWQGP-0007i6-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:44:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWQGO-0008PP-Gf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:44:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWQFH-0007eN-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:54514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWQFF-0005gg-6F; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2ECD81A17AD; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 00:43:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 28.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <87czc5y1wp.fsf@mail.jao.io> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295019 Archived-At: On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 22:47, Jose A Ortega Ruiz wrote: > After 4-5 days of continous use, a graphical emacs is consuming around > 2Gb for me, sometimes 3Gb; emacs-nox+kitty, combined, with the same > workload except displaying images, is under 500Mb. Which graphical emacs exactly? There are several options. Maybe "except displaying images" makes the difference? Have you tried the same workload both not displaying images? Maybe if you open images in gui emacs and do not close the buffers, they do not free the memory? Or some other issue? (I stopped using eshell because it eats my RAM but that is not graphics related.) >> Also there is no-toolkit emacs. > > not in wayland. Under Xwayland? I do not use wayland, but iirc pgtk backend should work there.