From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:09:24 +0000 Message-ID: <878rjgd0ej.fsf@posteo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37896"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, John Wiegley To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 17:10:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fwq-0009fH-27 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 17:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fwH-0006gD-Rf; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:09:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fwF-0006fh-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:09:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fwC-0004Aa-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:09:27 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB72A240027 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:09:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1670602162; bh=KGd80VutNCmZ3v3udXiLD/CgAx8Aa2EK4uJi5zj+W9g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=UWmJHnac/WQuOrl84cvPEVIbRXVlnQmjd3CZkz+ALwvAQtyeLcN7NXCwuLQMDv5TM qi4lKrMuzhEAobZvuTxZWsOknBfuwUScnNrdlQavZ8VcjxWp/Mm8O0j1okB8xc4GBg jX33Oy7tBlczg0BqQbC/dGzrHERpZFvGEK68YGAFFne80b5nDzuirYsQ158NzLCM5z GKBONTZsOOdbWiPkeLFj1xHyQs5U/voSUTl7ug+qZxhkcUU4W/A+s1adOmIH1RTijc LQKEAzTALt4hzfjKRlXjW3NQoa0bY1tcTlBd3zMO00vmmtUDnwd8sVY3iNhrdwG8fH iDonybo12tRzA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTGDf0hysz9rxQ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:09:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 8 Dec 2022 10:59:22 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301077 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Hi Emacs, > > Just to make this official: use-package has now landed on the emacs-29 > branch. This means, barring any major world disasters, solar storms, or > similar, use-package will officially be a part of Emacs 29. Great! A few comments on use-package.texi from briefly skimming the file: - It appears to be mentioning a few packages that are not available on GNU ELPA or NonGNU ELPA (e.g. git-gutter+, eruby-mode, dash-at-point, ess, color-moccur, moccur-edit, unfill). Should they be replaced with other packages to make sure the examples are consistently reproducible? - Why is "Debian GNU/Linux" formatted using @code? - Under the node "Byte-compiling", is the "@end group" in the "use-package ruby-mode" block intended to be placed where it is? - Is "NonGNU" an acronym itself? - Some packages are formatted as @file's (hydra, ivy, diminish, delight, ...). Does this really make sense? - MELPA is mention under vindex `use-package-always-pin', is this ok. AFAIR there was some decision to not mention MELPA in the official documentation (currently this also appears to be the only instance). - Under "Modes and interpreters", the file extension .rb is formatted using @samp, while (texinfo) @file implies that @file is the right macro for this situation. - It appears that use-package is sometimes formatted using @code and sometimes not. I can't make out a consistent rule. - GNU ELPA is also inconsistently marked up as a single or two separate acronyms. - There is still an instance of "see @ref" under the node "Global keybindings".