From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type declarations in Elisp Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 08:42:32 +0000 Message-ID: <878r9wg9l3.fsf@localhost> References: <87il984vxv.fsf@localhost> <03fc79f4-a532-71b1-0de9-8e52bdf3f138@gmail.com> <87msykfwym.fsf@localhost> <83lee3tjla.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxm7iu2.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 27 10:42:51 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBMA-0002aV-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 10:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBLU-0001A5-GZ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBLS-00019s-Q3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBLP-000564-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186D3240101 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 10:42:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693125722; bh=Uo9OMtSvm9gNicND1x6tO3DLcZKyBzf8sOqs77AuweQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=fSQJOdjjyF1edlFWgnYXdB32S+stcI7UacLCvaNg2H+twcQ/ndRAJOVcvZcIFY0t/ 6Efs2MZ/w2KSYFb4X7uxKKV+hWVEqGfTfbVkRvGvksj8o/v+4BJgufIEoA/+b49jjB XucUDlgYOGbhqC+4IRYV4foWeiRgkyoUPvjwE8hxNsp/SmeCSfAZ0dIpi6DrbWmjM4 b+ZanEfNbRc5i3JcMQbgQksPDKjQ90uLaoZLvS/ak1onkd+GuHyd+3cA8SVzJuNwv7 +HxWsvZF+qEfPvLYzsEFpChkgSKEPchwJlBk4OgvoPBubTHKWGdwNOJmtkWRLbAKE8 PpmkpnR5yJuHw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RYRy13HSXz6v4W; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 10:42:01 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wmxm7iu2.fsf@dataswamp.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309315 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg writes: > FWIW here are the results before I lost interest in the idea, > for now at least. Do I read correctly that most of the benchmarks run faster (if we disregard GC) in Elisp compared to CBCL? Elisp bubble: 0.68 sec vs CBCL 0.66 sec Elisp bubble-no-cons: 1.06 sec vs SBCL 0.81 sec Elisp fibn: 0.00 sec vs. SBCL 0.07 sec Elisp fibn-rec: 0.00 sec vs. SBCL 0.55 sec Elisp fibn-tc: 0.00 sec vs. SBCL 0.41 sec -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at