From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:24 +0100 Message-ID: <878r5owl4j.fsf@igel.home> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <834jggk4t9.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7eoe7f1.fsf@red-bean.com> <83ttofifaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87frzzkqmc.fsf@red-bean.com> <83jzpaid6o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31335"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 23:44:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rG5It-0007rC-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:44:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG5Hs-0000GN-1o; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG5Hp-0000G3-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG5Hm-000677-Vw; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SwT9q2j1Sz1s95D; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SwT9q0cLbz1qqlY; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMmISEmdCQoC; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:25 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: vaZOlbaStU7Z3RzMaE837RVjwqnMEKmMzU1yL93QTiivOtwq+R9dRyVE08Mfzq3e Original-Received: from igel.home (aftr-62-216-202-82.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.202.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CEDCD2C1264; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:43:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83jzpaid6o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:34:07 +0200") X-Yow: Yow! I threw up on my window! Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.10; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314024 Archived-At: On Dez 19 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Karl Fogel >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:00:59 -0600 >> >> On 18 Dec 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > >> >We don't advertise that key for a reason, so I don't think this >> >is a good idea. >> >> Okay. I'm curious what that reason is, if you have time to >> explain, but I'm fine accepting this decision as a given. > > The reason is simple: what you see is a side effect of how the user > interaction was implemented in this case. That is not true. read-multiple-choice documents that it uses the edit binding from query-replace-map, thus it is not a side effect, but an explicit choice. > If we ever decide to change the details of the implementation, C-r > will most probably stop working. That would be a regression. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."