From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:01:35 +0000 Message-ID: <8786a8e8faf45a989904@heytings.org> References: <32A55BBD-1A3F-4EC4-817F-7C3408C22A65@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddac64397c7d@heytings.org> <4B2A00EB-8C04-4B9D-BA86-692D67207AFD@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddc2bf87fd3a@heytings.org> <0009872A-AD9D-4B08-B714-BFEDDAAF9125@bydasein.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24612"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Paul W. Rankin" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 24 09:02:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOyTj-0005zu-AK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:02:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53090 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOyTi-0005gG-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOySU-0004zH-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:43146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOySQ-0005oL-Ty for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:01:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616572896; bh=KaA2jroVBnXAyN5wImcewc6Vpb7pd9Gr4IvvTz6i4BE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=mclp31FvisEaxM9BfWtA7E3lnrA52LIdqENuubCH040SmsPPAcvMGQ2GuySdLeWRZ +9xcgoP/anSrsx9d/NiuiAXhLn/jEx2+DID/7M4m8d7+8pLqPd7b/cA1Athr7Rc6Hc yyfuT8ZNe75lVQLNInszQDmd7iei9+KiuxazJH2Iy097YwqiTy5IF0KyUBS/RnN1Q6 q8eCri3YaTZsu2ByxqaMdBedRjIDdwoyuZTOYu/ODFkJ8qGKkkR5MXMUS3RvfZZRpN s/6eItrfnN28quMY7Q4jgp9mDTQt1f5DBBUEAfYo+qGB7ywWPfmyABgx5/kFyy+UWZ 1VyK8WwspeddQ== In-Reply-To: <0009872A-AD9D-4B08-B714-BFEDDAAF9125@bydasein.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266927 Archived-At: >>> No bugs here. Both of these work as expected. I think the issue is >>> you're confused about font-lock-mode and text properties. These are >>> not the same thing. Font-lock-mode is just one way to add text >>> properties to text, so may other functions. Deactivating >>> font-lock-mode does not remove all text properties, only on text with >>> the `(fontified . t)' property. This is why you're seeing what you're >>> seeing. >> >> Please explain this to Stefan M, who considers this to be bugs, who >> would like to deprecate the font-lock-fontify-{buffer,block} commands, >> and who guided me to write the font-lock-update command. > > For sure. If you can, please link me to the lists.gnu.org message? > I'm curious how you will explain to the author of font-lock-fontify-buffer that his command has no bugs, when he thinks it has and would like to obsolete it. The first message is at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-03/msg00581.html . By the way, what actual problems do you see in font-lock-update? Do you see cases where it produces unexpected results?