From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:32 -0500 Message-ID: <877jbhrwox.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87zmp399ue.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ll0ma3ow.fsf@zip.com.au> <87fyqu9ung.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131594671 2414 80.91.229.2 (10 Nov 2005 03:51:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, user42@zip.com.au, Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 04:51:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea3Rd-00027t-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:49:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea3Rd-0005N5-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea3RS-0005N0-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea3RR-0005Mo-27 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea3RQ-0005Ml-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.25] (helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ea3RQ-0007RX-FZ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:49:36 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([65.92.243.185]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20051110034935.BKVV26967.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F39F3D7662; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:09:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45659 Archived-At: > If this means passing "/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" as the second argument > to find-operation-coding-system, I think it is not clean. That > argument is documented to be _the same_ in meaning as the argument you > would pass to OPERATION, but this string isn't the same, isn't a valid > argument to insert-file-contents. IIUC currently the argument passed is "vi.po" but that is not the argument passed to operation either. So passing "/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" instead won't make it any worse. As a matter of fact I think passing "/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" is more correct: if we assume that a suitable file-name-handler is installed it's perfectly correct. Stefan