From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rudalics@gmx.at: check_min_window_sizes] Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:45:22 -0500 Message-ID: <877j77v2d9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87u0axpbba.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ek208z5o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <43F765BC.50608@gmx.at> <87bqx48gcc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <43F83E04.7020000@gmx.at> <43F995E9.4020209@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141671562 12697 80.91.229.6 (6 Mar 2006 18:59:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 06 19:59:11 2006 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FGKvH-0003CF-00 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:59:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGKvR-0000Hn-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:59:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGKgG-0001GY-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGKg7-0001BU-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGKg7-0001BD-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.19.6.82] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FGKiA-0000uY-Pe; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:45:38 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCFC112090F; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:45:22 -0500 (EST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:35:59 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Spam-Report: 5.0 points; * 0.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO * 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56% * [score: 0.5000] * 5.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net * [Blocked - see ] Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51280 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > [I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response.] > > That's a bug in `mouse-drag-vertical-line'. It can be reproduced by > removing fringes and customizing window-min-width to 2. If you now > split a window horizontally and drag the vertical divider such that the > right window shrinks to its minimum width you can't enlarge it anymore. > > The bug occurs because `mouse-drag-vertical-line' compares coordinates > returned by `window-edges' with `frame-width'. I believe that > `window-inside-edges' should be used here, see the attached patch. > > Does anyone see a problem in Martin's patch? Apparently not.