Re: Feature request: new function start-remote-process

[Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

Hi Stefan,

> In order not to derogate(?) to the custom of objecting late, I'll add an
> objection right now: the name is wrong because it indicates for what you use
> the feature rather than what it does.  I think that the name should include
> "file" somewhere rather than (or at least additionally to) "remote", since
> the key aspect compared to start-process is that it's a file-name operation.
> So I'd call it "start-file-process".  Other than that, I fully support this
> feature, of course.

Do you still object the name? Otherwise, I'ld like to commit the change
into the trunk.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.