From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:37:59 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <877ig8vkue.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87pru8enjx.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6l3u8f.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6j7cga.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003001c8823a$d7cd5010$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87lk4r5v2o.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003101c88242$18736fd0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <7dbe73ed0803100313g46d079dag91e1b8af1f750ee8@mail.gmail.com> <47D53BF1.70401@gmail.com> <47D54B62.9010404@gmail.com> <87k5kai2y8.fsf@jurta.org> <87wso9c7dn.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205283162 30144 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 00:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:52:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 01:53:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZFDP-000769-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:53:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZFCq-0007RD-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:52:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZFB7-0006ji-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZFB3-0006gR-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:50:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZFB3-0006gI-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:50:41 -0400 Original-Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.197]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZFB2-0005pU-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZFB0-000PxE-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:50:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wso9c7dn.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> (Manoj Srivastava's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:50:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Scanner-Signature: 068dd79c68aafbc760c35e97c5d420ed X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2382 [Mar 11 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 11 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92226 Archived-At: >> This means that if your history contains something like "rm -rf >> /", and you accidently type `M-! M-p RET', your data are lost ;-) > >> Why does your history contain "rm -rf /"? Did you run that command >> recently? > > A more plausible scenario is if I have recently run "rm -rf .", > in a directory where that was appropriate. Now I have cd'd to > a different directory (perhaps even my home directory), where executing > that command could do damage. Yes, I meant exactly the same scenario. When in a dired buffer I type e.g. `! du -s RET' on a directory, and after this I type `! rm -rf RET' on the same directory. Then if I want to repeat the command `du -s' on another directory, I type `! M-p', and I feel uneasy when at the last moment before confirming the command with RET, I notice a wrong command. There is no such problems with other commands that are less damaging. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/