From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:58:54 +0900 Message-ID: <877if2iq0x.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <8763unt4nz.fsf@gmx.de> <87hce7rmbg.fsf@gmx.de> <87d4ouiysx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <963F9F59-4E90-4A1A-BD14-6D9983250E39@Freenet.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208044166 28471 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2008 23:49:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Sven Joachim To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 01:49:59 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkpTq-0006dj-V8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 01:49:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkpTC-0006H1-U9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkpT8-0006Gc-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkpT8-0006GK-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkpT7-0006GH-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkpT7-0000dx-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JkpT7-0006HR-9M for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkpT4-0000dY-RK for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkpSz-0000cC-Nl; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D911535AC; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:49:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F389C1A29F3; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:58:54 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <963F9F59-4E90-4A1A-BD14-6D9983250E39@Freenet.DE> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" 2785829fe37c XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95091 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22011 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > > Am 12.04.2008 um 22:49 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull: > > Then it is very useful to have a convenient unique identifier for > > each build. > > GNU Emacs has this information when you start to send a bug report. > > > Upon configuration some files are overwritten. Upon 'make bootstrap' > some more files are overwritten even twice. Upon 'make install' all > files (hopefully) are overwritten. Isn't that already enough uniqueness? No. Because the files are overwritten, you cannot determine whether the builds are the same or not.