From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: movement bindings in c-mode Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:09:56 +0900 Message-ID: <877icgz1hn.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <20080623141334.GA7132@muc.de> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214230251 14962 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2008 14:10:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 23 16:11:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAmlG-0008Q4-FN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46305 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAmkQ-00039e-Va for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAmkK-00038y-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAmkI-00038B-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45323 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAmkI-000387-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]:53814) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAmk4-0001nI-NE; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.33.237.215.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.33.237.215] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1KAmk2-00081G-49; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:09:58 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3AF732F3A; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:09:57 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <20080623141334.GA7132@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:13:34 +0000") Original-Lines: 16 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99778 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > I think beginning-of-defun-function should be passed the repeat count > (naturally doing the right thing when that function can't take it). Actually, I just looked at the place where beginning-of-defun-function is called (in `beginning-of-defun-raw'), and it _does_ pass the repeat count (with appropriate handling for old-style callees that don't expect it). So then this should be simple, right? -Miles -- Conservative, n. A statesman enamored of existing evils, as opposed to a Liberal, who wants to replace them with new ones.