From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:53:20 +0900 Message-ID: <877hs2nd7z.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262353418 26056 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 13:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 14:43:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQhms-0005gJ-Fc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:43:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQhms-000433-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQhmm-00042g-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQhmi-0003z4-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45476 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQhmh-0003yu-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:38519) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQhmh-0003Ul-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQhmg-0002HU-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E8C7FFA; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:43:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E6F81A33D7; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:53:21 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 1444e28f1a3d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119203 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > bzr push # ugh > # dates in ChangeLog are wrong, so you need an additional commit to > fix the ChangeLog entries > > so it only really works for fixes that do not need ChangeLog entries. Why are the dates in the ChangeLog wrong? The commit history is in "bzr log", the work history is in the ChangeLog. What's the problem with that? Does Emacs have a policy that ChangeLog dates must correspond to the commit sequence or some such?