From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unable to close a bug in the tracker. Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:59:49 +0100 Message-ID: <877hrl1m5m.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wc1h524.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874omph4f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5dmqfw.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263434441 12415 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 02:00:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 03:00:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVF0i-0001ZH-EC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:00:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47403 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVF0j-0003Wj-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:00:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVF0c-0003Ur-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVF0Y-0003U7-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60218 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVF0Y-0003Tz-I4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59772) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVF0Y-0002u6-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NVF0M-0001S6-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:00:10 +0100 Original-Received: from 167.red-83-37-167.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.37.167.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:00:10 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 167.red-83-37-167.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:00:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 167.red-83-37-167.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lh3KSySQjg5Q0cU4heehL5KdJ5I= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119960 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Chong Yidong writes: >>One of the moderators probably clicked on the button for "Add >>kfogel@red-bean.com to the list of automatically accepted posters" >>(since he's now on that list). But, at the same time, the moderator >>accidentally clicked on the button to discard those two particlar emails >>he'd sent. >> >>Anyway, sorry about that, Karl. If you send again, your emails should >>go through without any further problems. > > Thank you. Yeah, that's a well-known bug in the Mailman moderation > interface (I don't know if that's what the moderator is using, but it > sounds like, since I've made that mistake in Mailman before too :-) .) The moderator was me. Your messages were mixed into a long batch of spam, noticed that they were from you and added your e-mail address to the accept list. I'll swear that marked the Accept radiobutton for the specific messages too, but it seems I failed to do that. I'm very sorry about this mistake. Please accept my apologies, Karl. BTW, isn't it possible to setup a spam filter that automatically discards the most obvious occurrences? In the first week as moderator, I received 1800 notifications about pending approvals, with perhaps 98% of them spam. -- Óscar