From: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: merge conlict?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:39:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877hr61c68.fsf@telefonica.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2y6jm8dm0.fsf@igel.home
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> For emacs purposes, you are interested on knowing *who* broke the build
>> and *when* he incorporated the faulty change into upstream's trunk.
>
> It seems pretty useless if cannot find out which revision of a big merge
> is to blame.
The idea is to be able to say "Joe's revision X broke the build" and
then is Joe's bussiness to determine which of the revisions he merged on
the revision X broke the build.
There is no concept of "big merge" on bzr. (nor on git, AFAIK) So either
you include the merged revisions and cope with unstable intermediate
points or you ignore them, locate the merge point where the problem was
introduced on mainline, and then proceed to bisect the branch that
originated that merge point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1NZJ1t-00089o-ST@monty-python.gnu.org>
2010-01-25 7:43 ` merge conlict? Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 8:46 ` Glenn Morris
2010-01-25 9:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 13:54 ` NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream (was: merge conlict?) Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 17:29 ` NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream Mark A. Hershberger
2010-01-25 18:28 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 9:26 ` merge conlict? Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 10:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 10:30 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 11:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 11:27 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 11:55 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 12:22 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 12:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 12:48 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 13:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 13:38 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 14:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 14:39 ` Óscar Fuentes [this message]
2010-01-25 15:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 15:57 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 16:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:06 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 18:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:24 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 18:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 18:50 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 19:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 19:21 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 19:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 20:07 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 20:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 21:24 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 21:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 23:19 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 23:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 23:57 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 15:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 18:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 15:15 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 17:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 17:09 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 22:10 ` David Reitter
2010-01-25 23:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 0:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 1:38 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:30 ` David Reitter
2010-01-25 13:41 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 13:52 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2010-01-25 12:30 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 1:49 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 9:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 10:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:06 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 16:49 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 16:49 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 17:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 18:20 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-26 18:42 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-26 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 19:38 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 22:43 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-27 1:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-27 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 10:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 12:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 12:43 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-25 10:27 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 3:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-26 8:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 9:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 10:10 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-26 10:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-26 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 11:33 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 12:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 12:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-25 13:17 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-01-25 14:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-25 14:03 ` Interpreting git diff --cc [was: merge conlict?] Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 0:05 ` merge conlict? Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 0:04 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 2:14 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-26 4:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-26 16:50 ` Richard Stallman
2010-01-26 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-28 2:10 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2010-01-28 4:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-28 4:13 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2010-01-28 5:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877hr61c68.fsf@telefonica.net \
--to=ofv@wanadoo.es \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).