From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLogs on CVS? Commit netiquette. Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:08:13 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <877hq9jgqq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <5f0ff9221002181207v3244055ax3b3223833a901609@mail.gmail.com> <87eiki443f.fsf@red-bean.com> <5f0ff9221002181621t1084ee2av6cb2149f480128a7@mail.gmail.com> <87hbpexde6.fsf@telefonica.net> <5f0ff9221002181920m48377322m51d9206790d10f03@mail.gmail.com> <87pr41zscu.fsf@red-bean.com> <4B7E3AB0.4070305@swipnet.se> <5f0ff9221002190818u55f6ccf3r7bae3508b4d39bfd@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266599717 12158 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2010 17:15:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 18:15:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiWRZ-0003Fh-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:15:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiWRW-0003ds-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NiWMo-0008NZ-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38349 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiWMa-000854-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:10:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiWLJ-0002cw-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:08:41 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiWLJ-0002cm-AH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:08:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiWLD-0006yQ-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c2559.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.37.89]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c2559.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:08:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c2559.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MCElDhw2grJH/vali6ARdngDsK4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121232 Archived-At: "T.V. Raman" writes: > the Git repos is a life saver. Yes. > Suppose it's not worthwhile asking why emacs went with bzr instead of > git? No. -- David Kastrup