From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow TLS connections from some servers Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:13:43 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <877h3qaxrc.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87pqio7red.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319754020 21681 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 22:20:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:20:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 00:20:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYJ5-0006mR-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYJ5-0004Vb-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYJ2-0004VK-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYIz-0006tl-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYIz-0006tW-1G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJYIx-0006i2-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:20:07 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:20:07 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:20:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNB/YrEFZOKUcQJiUTEl3hldyKM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145686 Archived-At: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:11:54 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:48:52 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Currently, the following takes ten seconds for me: LMI> (url-retrieve "https://www.deleak.com/blog/wp-content/uploads//2011/06/annalogoonblack.jpg" #'ignore) LMI> While it's evaling Emacs is completely unresponsive. gdb seems to say LMI> that it's deep in gnutls-boot somewhere during this time. LMI> Would it be possible to make the gnutls-boot code more asynchronous? TZ> GnuTLS itself is asynchronous and Emacs processes are sort of TZ> asynchronous, but AFAICT the Emacs part that *initializes* a process TZ> isn't. So fixing this could require moving the `gnutls-boot' call to TZ> after the process is initialized, which would of course require more TZ> bookkeeping and work. TZ> Could someone with better knowledge of the Emacs processes confirm my TZ> guess or tell me a better way? I'll put this on my GnuTLS TODO list as well as I review the code. Thanks Ted