From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:33:16 +0100 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <877gophqgz.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <83pq2ib53h.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw3egpla.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <83ehiyarzm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355153621 24859 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2012 15:33:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 10 16:33:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5Mf-0002G3-Ga for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:33:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43435 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5MS-0001lU-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5ML-0001kG-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5MK-0004Fb-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:48409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5MA-0004C8-NO; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from silenus.orebokech.com (silenus [192.168.1.4]) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE8F1880206; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:33:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by silenus.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E0B9A014A; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:33:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83ehiyarzm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:42:21 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 88.190.240.207 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155434 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > What about "make -j2"? That was the basis for comparison, so going to > higher parallelization gets in the way of comparison. make -j2 bootstrap: 246.51s user 15.08s system 124% cpu 3:30.54 total