From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111349: * lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el (cperl-calculate-indent): Do not stagger Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:49:47 +0900 Message-ID: <877go3ov9w.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ip7nqroz.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y5gjgu8e.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87k3s3rwhc.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356655805 26313 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2012 00:50:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Sam Steingold , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 28 01:50:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ToO9U-0001EI-Na for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToO9G-0006bO-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToO9C-0006Zd-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToO96-0001Kp-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:45339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToO96-0001JL-Cv; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:49:56 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284019708F8; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:49:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E53441A27B1; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:49:47 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87k3s3rwhc.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155951 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > Juri Linkov writes: > > >>> - from 109911 (see the new test). > >>> + from Bug#109911 (see the new test). > >> > >> This change is inaccurate. 109911 is a Bazaar revision, not a bug number. > > > > To avoid ambiguity and misunderstanding revisions should have a prefix > > similar to bug numbers, e.g. revno#109911 or revno:109911. > > Thanks, will do next time. > I guess I'm used to Git, where you don't usually prefix commit ids with > anything. Are those strings valid syntax for referencing bzr revisions (eg in log or checkout)? It would be best to standardize on valid syntax (eg, for cut and paste). Only rarely useful, I suppose, but ...