From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail] Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:18:43 +0100 Message-ID: <877gblk4zw.fsf@igel.home> References: <83txew8m9v.fsf@gnu.org> <466a2599-43b3-4406-8bad-22cfb49c364f@default> <877gbp116q.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <1494374.2rpVF7jNgB@descartes> <87eh5uqka9.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <857gblofu0.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <87bo0xk732.fsf@igel.home> <851u1todsp.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386105535 22373 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2013 21:18:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Felipe Contreras Garza To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 22:19:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnxMy-0003jX-10 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:19:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnxMx-0007WN-IA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnxMq-0007T6-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:18:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnxMk-0005bY-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:46211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnxMk-0005b1-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:18:46 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3dYwzS5JPMz4KK4S; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:18:44 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3dYwzS55MHzbbbq; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:18:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3slWbJ6f6yxx; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:18:43 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 5sk18BqiCWLDCQzjUoB1SSbuK+WUOe4YHeKtwwMKQgk= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-234-66.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.234.66]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:18:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7594F2C0429; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:18:43 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Where do your SOCKS go when you lose them in th' WASHER? In-Reply-To: <851u1todsp.fsf@iznogoud.viz> (Wolfgang Jenkner's message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:55:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166056 Archived-At: Wolfgang Jenkner writes: > On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Wolfgang Jenkner writes: >> >>> Like other people I have done some experiments with local repositories >>> and there is a thing that bothers me: While, by default, `git push' to >>> some other git repo succeeds only if this would not change the history >>> of what is already in that repo, there is apparently no such safeguard >>> against rewriting history in an upstream bzr repo (and pushing to >>> a bound branch instead does not quite work). >> >> This should work properly with git-remote-bzr. > > The example I gave used this remote helper (included with git 1.8.4.3). Then this part doesn't work: try: peer.bzrdir.push_branch(branch, revision_id=revid) except bzrlib.errors.DivergedBranches: print "error %s non-fast forward" % ref continue Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."